Choosing an AI visibility tool for a real estate agency means accepting which contest is already lost. Listing, median and recent sales questions get answered from portals and property data providers, and no amount of tracking changes that. What remains open is the vendor question, asked suburb by suburb: who should sell my house here, what will it cost me, and is this agent any good. Suburbs multiply the prompt set quickly, and much of the agent reputation an assistant draws on sits on community and video platforms rather than on any agency website.
01What decides it here
01
Vendors ask about their own suburb and nothing else, so each area is its own prompt and an agency covering twenty areas across sales and property management is tracking a large set. Count areas times question types honestly, because that number decides the tier and the tier is where the cost sits.
02
Commission rates, agent choice and selling experiences are argued about at length on community platforms and in video, and those discussions are exactly the corroborating material an assistant reaches for when a question involves money. Tracking that names those surfaces reports on the part of the answer an agency cannot write for itself.
03
Listing and market data questions belong to the portals and the data providers behind them, and tracking those prompts produces a stable, unactionable result. Spend the allowance on vendor questions, appraisal questions and named-agent questions, where an agency can actually move.
04
Vendors pick an agent and tolerate the agency, which makes named-agent questions the ones carrying commercial weight. Few tools model individuals as entities, so agent-name prompts usually have to be written by hand into whatever set gets bought.
02The picks
Vendor claims checked 8 August 2026
01 · Suite
Best for: Agencies making positioning decisions
Two tiers published: "Select platforms" at $398/month and "All platforms" at $699/month. Source
A market-scale prompt database answers what an area is genuinely asking rather than what an agency assumes, and the tracked community and video surfaces are where agent reputation actually forms. The largest custom check allowance of the tools examined also absorbs suburb multiplication better than the alternatives.
02 · Platform
Best for: A single-office agency
Lite at $29/month, Standard at $189/month, Premium at $489/month, Enterprise custom. Annual billing is listed at a 15% discount. Source
Lowest published entry price of the tools examined, which suits an office with a handful of core suburbs and no appetite for a market intelligence programme. Enough to find out whether the agency gets named on vendor questions at all.
03 · Platform
Best for: Multi-office groups
Starter at "$99/month" and Growth at "$399/month", both billed yearly. Enterprise is listed as custom. Source
Worth the step up when offices and areas multiply and each needs reading separately rather than blended into a brand figure. Check how regions and seats are counted before committing.
Every figure above is quoted from the vendor’s own published pages and links to the page it came from. Products change pricing and feature tiers without notice, so check the source before deciding on it. KoldOS is an agency rather than a competing tool, and takes no commission on any of these.
03What to watch for
04When to buy none of them
Vendors ask what selling costs, how long it takes and who has sold near them, and most agency sites answer with a listing feed and a staff grid. An agency in that position is invisible on the only questions the portals have left open, and the fix is writing the cost and process facts and turning agents into people with records rather than photographs. None of that needs a subscription. Measurement earns its place once something on the site is capable of being quoted.
05Questions
Free, and first
All of these tools tell you that you are absent. Our free checker tells you why, across twenty-three checks, with every finding traced to a line in your HTML. No account and no email.